Bronstein v. Baltimore & O. R.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
These three cases, consolidated and tried together to the Court without a jury, were brought to recover damages for injuries to seventy-six carloads of watermelons, transported from various points in Georgia, Florida and South .Carolina to Philadelphia. The plaintiff is the consignee and holder of the bills of lading. The defendant was the delivering carrier.
The evidence shows that the melons were loaded in bulk in accordance with the tariff classifications and rules of the carriers, packed tightly in cars lined with paper and padded with straw, and that when…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
3Cited by8 opinions
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company v. Metal-Matic, Inc., Metal-Matic, Inc. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Meltzer v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Akerly v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. HillisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Meltzer v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.