Smith v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted by a jury of sexually assaulting his girlfriend’s six-year-old daughter. He presently challenges the propriety of allowing certain witnesses to testify at his trial. For the reasons expressed below, we affirm.
The case involves child sexual abuse in a family setting. Appéllant lived with his girlfriend and her daughter. Testimony indicated that the child looked upon appellant as her father. While appellant’s girlfriend worked, he stayed home and supervised the child. On September 20, 1982, the child told her mother that appellant had been sexually molesting her.…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Childers v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Lanoue v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Wilson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Terrible v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1962
4Cited by50 opinions
- State v. ForetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Duckett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MoranArizona Supreme Court · 1986
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.