Terrible v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, C. J.:
Appellant was held to answer in the district court by order of the committing magistrate following a preliminary hearing on the charge of lewdness with a minor. The present appeal is from denial by the district court of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
The sole question for our determination is Whether the complaining witness, a minor girl of the age of six and one-half years, was a competent witness. If she was not, a reversal must follow. If she was, the order denying the writ must be affirmed. Both parties concede that such is the situation. We have…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. LoignonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. DelaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Yarbrough v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Shuff v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Lanoue v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Wilson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Wilson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.