Legal Opinion

Terrible v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1962No. 4450PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, C. J.:

Appellant was held to answer in the district court by order of the committing magistrate following a preliminary hearing on the charge of lewdness with a minor. The present appeal is from denial by the district court of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

The sole question for our determination is Whether the complaining witness, a minor girl of the age of six and one-half years, was a competent witness. If she was not, a reversal must follow. If she was, the order denying the writ must be affirmed. Both parties concede that such is the situation. We have…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. LoignonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. People v. DelaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. People v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Yarbrough v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Shuff v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lanoue v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Wilson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Wilson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API