Travis Haney v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Senior Judge:
While this court’s consideration of appellant Travis Haney’s direct appeal was pending, 1 he filed a motion in the trial court claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, under D.C.Code § 23-110 (2012 Repl.), in part because his trial counsel failed to file a motion to suppress the videotaped statement he made to a police detective. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court found that Mr. Haney’s trial counsel’s performance was constitutionally deficient because he did not “appreciate that there was a basis for suppressing a portion of [Mr. Haney’s] statement.” 2…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Cosio v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Morten v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Michael A. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019