Nicita v. City of Oregon City
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
DUNCAN, J. pro tempore
Petitioner seeks judicial review of a final order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). In that order, LUBA remanded the City of Oregon City’s decision to approve comprehensive plan map and zoning map amendments for Historic Properties, LLC property. LUBA’s remand was based on its determination that the city’s decision did not comply with Statewide Planning Goal 5. As relevant here, LUBA’s order also sustained the city’s determination that Historic Properties’ application complied with Goal 2.3 (Corridors) of the Oregon City Comprehensive Plan (OCCP). On review,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- South of Sunnyside Neighborhood League v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Siporen v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Setniker v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020