Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 2, 1961No. 6 Div. 426PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment rendered for defendant on the verdict of a jury, in an action at law for damages for illness, pain, annoyance, and inconvenience allegedly suffered by plaintiff as “the proximate consequence of the negligence of the defendant or his agents in after notice to defendant, failing and refusing to repair said radiator (s),” in a certain apartment which plaintiff occupied as lessee of the defendant.

The written lease, attached as an exhibit to the complaint, describes the term of the lease as follows:

“ * * * during the term of 1 year…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McLaney v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Bailey v. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Alabama Co. v. NorwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Preston v. LaSalle Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HodgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Nettles v. BishopSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Clayton v. LLB TIMBER CO., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  4. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company v. LangAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Clayton v. LLB TIMBER CO., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API