Bailey v. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad Company
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWYN, Justice.
Action by employee, appellant here, against his employer, appellee, claiming damages for a silicotic condition allegedly contracted and aggravated as a proximate consequence of his employment in appellee’s underground iron ore mines. The complaint consists of one count and charges a violation of the common law duty of the defendant “to exercise due and reasonable care to furnish and provide the plaintiff with a reasonably safe place in which to perform his duties” as an employee of the defendant. The specific dereliction charged is that plaintiff’s working places “were not…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Weis v. WeisOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. KohlmeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Norwood v. Great American Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Lockett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Reed v. Order of United Commercial TravelersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Joseph E. Thomas v. Ruth A. Martin HoganCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- Roan v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- HARVEY REGLAND COMPANY v. NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Salotti v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.