Legal Opinion

Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company v. Lang

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

This appeal was submitted without oral argument October 21, 1965, with a single assignment, viz., that the court below erred in overruling appellant’s motion for new trial.

The Langs brought suit for $500 against Mutual of Omaha for breach of a hospital or medical indemnity policy for expense within the indemnifying agreement on account of Mrs. Lang’s averred foreshortened pregnancy which normally would have resulted in childbirth more than ten months after the policy date.

The plea of the company was that, “The allegations of the complaint are not true.” Thus framed, trial was had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. v. CookeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Vinyard v. DuckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Allred v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adams v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API