Legal Opinion

Sheinberg v. Fluor Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 23, 1981No. 81 Civ. 2275 (LBS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION RENDERED IN OPEN COURT

SAND, District Judge.

This action is currently before the Court upon plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction enjoining the tender offer by Fluor Corporation through Fluor Acquisition Corporation, hereinafter referred to collectively as Fluor, to purchase up to approximately 45 percent of the shares of common stock of St. Joe Minerals Corporation.

Oral argument was heard on April 22, 1981. Neither plaintiff nor defendants have sought an evidentiary hearing or leave to conduct any discovery.

For the reasons stated herein, the plaintiff’s application is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jack Kahn Music Co., Inc. v. Baldwin Piano & Organ CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Buffalo Forge Co. v. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. CHRIS-CRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANGOR PUNTA CORPORATION and David W. Wallace, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. Securities and Exchange Com'n v. Arvida CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  5. McCloskey v. Epko Shoes, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Radol v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. Radol v. ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
  3. Radol v. ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
  4. New York City Employees' Retirement System v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Radol v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API