Legal Opinion

Radol v. Thomas

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 2, 1983No. C-1-82-13PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CARL B. RUBIN, Chief Judge.

This case involves the takeover of Marathon Oil Company (“Marathon”) by United States Steel (“Steel”). This matter is before the Court on two Motions for Partial Summary Judgment, one by those defendants connected with Marathon and one by those defendants connected with Steel. As the arguments contained in each are virtually identical, the two Motions will be addressed as one. The Motion seeks summary judgment on all of plaintiffs’ claims under the federal securities laws.

Facts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Billy K. Watkins v. Northwestern Ohio Tractor Pullers Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Starkman v. Marathon Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  2. Radol v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. Polar International Brokerage Corp. v. ReeveDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  4. Flynn v. Bass Brothers Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. Nutis v. Penn Merchandising Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API