Legal Opinion

Radol v. Thomas

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 16, 1982No. C-1-82-13PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, OPINION AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

CARL B. RUBIN, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion for a Preliminary Injunction filed by plaintiffs and upon hearings in this Court on March 2, 3 and 4, 1982 at which testimony and evidence were presented. Plaintiffs sought to enjoin a proposed merger between United States Steel, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of United States Steel (hereinafter U. S. Steel) and Marathon Oil Company (hereinafter Marathon). On March 9, 1982, this Court issued an order denying the plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, and advised…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. SandbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Dan River, Inc. v. IcahnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  3. Radol v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  4. Martin Marietta Corp. v. Bendix Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1982
  5. Radol v. ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API