Simpson v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARROW, J.
In this criminal appeal, we hold that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of an unrelated drug sale by the defendant because it was admitted for the mere purpose of impeaching the defendant regarding his testimony on a collateral matter elicited on cross-examination. In addition, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting into evidence an aerial photograph of the neighborhood where the offense occurred.
• The defendant was charged with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and possession of heroin with intent to distribute. He was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lavinder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Martin v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Allen v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Maynard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
- Boyd v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tatum v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
- Talbert v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
- Waller v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
- Singleton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
- Singleton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.