Legal Opinion

Prophett v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 1932No. 5 Div. 872PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

By assignment of error, counsel for appellant designate specifically the points of decision relied upon for a reversal of the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken. While the statute (section 325S, Code 1923) expressly provides that assignment of errors in criminal cases is not necessary, yet it is permissible, and we commend the practice as having the tendency to bring directly to the court’s attention the grounds for a reversal insisted upon on appeal. This practice in no manner militates against a full consideration by the reviewing court of all questions apparent on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  4. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  5. Chappell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
  2. Conley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  3. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  4. Jackson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Blakeney v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API