Legal Opinion

Vogt v. Guidry

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1920No. 6360PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Kendall County; R. H. Burney, Judge. Action by Beulah Guidry against Arthur Vogt. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPly, C. J.

This is a suit for damages, based on a breach of promise of marriage, instituted by appellee against appellant. ' Appellant admitted the existence of a contract to marry between him and appellee, but alleged that he had been voluntarily released from such contract by appellee on May 30, 1919, for a valuable consideration; that ap-pellee was an employé of the firm of Vogt Hardware Company, of which appellant was a member, from August 2, 1918, to May 29, 1919; that it was her duty to sell goods, to keep the books, and assist appellant in counting the cash indicated by the cash register, to aid…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Colburn v. MarbleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Fisher v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vogt v. GuidryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Coombs v. FazzioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Moore v. BramlettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Moore v. BramlettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API