Hanisco v. Township of Warminster
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.
Respectfully, I dissent. The two-year extension of the waste services contract between the Township of Warminster (Township) and Solid Waste Services, Inc. d/b/a J.P. Mascaro & Sons (Mascaro) did not trigger another round of competitive bidding requirements when the contractor, the low bidder, agreed to further reduce its low-bid price during the extension period. This is because, as the trial court *127concluded, the extension was a term addressed in the original bidding procedure. Further, because the amendment did not affect the scope or type of services…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Hibbs v. ArensbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Morse v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- American Totalisator Co., Inc. v. SeligmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Mazet v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hanisco v. Township of WarminsterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012