Legal Opinion

Barger v. McCoy Hillard & Parks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1995No. COA94-876PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, John C., Judge.

Plaintiffs’ sole assignment of error is that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs argue that there are genuine issues of material fact and that defendants were not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We affirm the order of the trial court, except as to plaintiffs’ claim of constructive fraudulent misrepresentation. As to that claim, we reverse summary judgment and remand to the trial court.

Our analysis in this case turns on the nature of plaintiffs’ claimed injuries. Because of defendants’ alleged breach of contract…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Terry v. TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Howell v. FisherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Rhodes v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. C. Severin Buschmann, Jr. v. Professional Men's AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barger v. McCoy Hillard & ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. NationsBank of North Carolina, N.A. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Polsky v. BDO SeidmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Allen v. FerreraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Allen Ex Rel. Allen & Brock v. FerreraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API