Legal Opinion

Polsky v. BDO Seidman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 17, 1997No. 2-96-1108PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

Plaintiff, Michael Polsky, appeals from a series of trial court orders that dismissed his first amended complaint; granted a motion for sanctions against him; denied his motion for reconsideration; and awarded fees and costs against him. Defendants, BDO Seidman (BDO), Richard Krieberg (Krieberg), and Leland Graul (Graul), cross-appeal from the order awarding fees and costs.

On August 2, 1995, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants in the circuit court of Lake County. A subsequent first amended complaint (the amended complaint) identified BDO as an accounting firm and Krieberg and Graul…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Zedella v. GibsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Nottage v. JekaIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Hayes v. Mercy Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Boaden v. Department of Law EnforcementIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bova v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
  2. Evanston Insurance Co. v. RiseboroughIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Evans v. Lima Lima Flight Team, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Barrett v. FonorowAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Zimmerman v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API