Polsky v. BDO Seidman
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle
Plaintiff, Michael Polsky, appeals from a series of trial court orders that dismissed his first amended complaint; granted a motion for sanctions against him; denied his motion for reconsideration; and awarded fees and costs against him. Defendants, BDO Seidman (BDO), Richard Krieberg (Krieberg), and Leland Graul (Graul), cross-appeal from the order awarding fees and costs.
On August 2, 1995, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants in the circuit court of Lake County. A subsequent first amended complaint (the amended complaint) identified BDO as an accounting firm and Krieberg and Graul…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Zedella v. GibsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Nottage v. JekaIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Hayes v. Mercy Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Boaden v. Department of Law EnforcementIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bova v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
- Evanston Insurance Co. v. RiseboroughIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
- Evans v. Lima Lima Flight Team, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Barrett v. FonorowAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Zimmerman v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.