State v. Andaz
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtPellegrino, J.
The defendant, Dave Andaz, also known as David Polek, 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding him in violation of his probation pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32. 2 On appeal, the defendant claims that his due process right to fair notice of the charges against him was violated by the state's filing of a substitute information changing the underlying basis for his violation of probation six days prior to his probation revocation hearing. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. MarsalaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- State v. HooksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. CarterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. OutlawConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DunbarConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. Angel A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- State v. OverstreetConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- State v. AndazSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. OrrConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020