Baradell v. BD. OF SOCIAL SERVS. PITTSYLVANIA CTY.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KISER, Chief Judge.
Before me are defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Supplemental Motion to Dismiss Based on Plaintiffs Failure to Respond. The parties have fully briefed the issues involved and have presented oral argument. The motions are therefore ripe for disposition. For the reasons contained herein, I am of the opinion that defendants’ Motion to Dismiss should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants’ Supplemental Motion to Dismiss Based on Plaintiffs Failure to Respond should be DENIED.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND:
This is an employment discrimination action. On September…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bruce Beaudett v. City of Hampton City Attorneys A. Paul Burton and W. Stephen Moore Judge T.H. Wilson, II and Judge Nelson T. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Adams v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Womack v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Devnew v. Brown & Brown, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Lane v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Earley v. MarionDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2008
- Carter v. Arlington Public School SystemDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- Eweka v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.