Legal Opinion

Theurkauf v. Ireland

United States Circuit Court

Decided March 22, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Motion to Remand.

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.

On December 14, 1885, the last day for answering, a demurrer to the complaint was filed; one of the grounds being that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. On December 21st, the demurrer was withdrawn by consent of parties, and defendant allowed 10 days’ further time within which to answer to the merits. At the expiration of the 10 days allowed defendant procured another extension of time to answer, which carried it to January 10, 1886. On January 9, 1886, defendant answered, and immediately afterwards, on the same day, filed a petition for removal.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gold-Washing and Water Co. v. KeyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Alley v. NottSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. SpeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Trafton v. NouguesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1877

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Austin v. GaganU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1889
  2. California Oil & Gas Co. of Arizona v. MillerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
  3. Delbanco v. SingletaryU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1889
  4. Nelson v. Southern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1909
  5. Seattle, R. & S. Ry. Co. v. City of SeattleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Washington · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API