Commercial Credit Claims v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Lancaster)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CASTILLE, Justice.
This Court granted review in order to decide whether an employer seeking to terminate a claimant’s workers’ compensation benefits must disprove a causal relationship between the work-related injury and a subsequently alleged psychiatric injury where the employer accepted liability in the Notice of Compensation Payable only for the physical injuries suffered from the work-related accident. We find that in these circumstances, the employee, not the employer, shoulders the burden of establishing a causal relationship between the work-related injury and a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Beissel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Ryan v. Workman's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Gumro v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
3Cited by49 opinions
- Cinram Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Westmoreland County v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Jeanes Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- GA & FC Wagman, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Aucker)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.