Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Schneider
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Ripley Circuit Court; Willard New, Judge. Action by Kate Schneider against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.
Appellee brought this action against appellant to recover damages for personal injuries received by her at a public crossing, through the alleged negligence of appellant. The complaint was originally in two paragraphs. There was a several demurrer to each paragraph, for want of sufficient facts. This demurrer was sustained as to the first paragraph and overruled as to the second. The cause was put at issue, and trial had, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of appellee for $1,200.
The action of the court in overruling (1) appellant’s demurrer to the second paragraph of complaint; (2)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HeineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. YundtIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. CoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tippecanoe Loan & Trust Co. v. JesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Goodall v. Ponderosa Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. McFarrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Chicago & Erie Railroad v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.