Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Coffman
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Marion Circuit Court; H. G. Allen, Judge. Action by Jerome B. Coffman against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.
The appellee brought the action in which the judgment from which this, appeal is prosecuted .was rendered to recover for injuries to his person, alleged to have been caused by tlie negligence of the appellant. The complaint is in two paragraphs. To each paragraph a demurrer was overruled. Issue was formed by an answer of general denial. Trial by jury and verdict for plaintiff.
The specifications in the assignment -of errors allege: (1) That the trial court erred in overruling the demurrer to the first paragraph of the compláint; (2) in overruling the demurrer to the second paragraph of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. StickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. NoelIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. YundtIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
3Cited by10 opinions
- Birmingham Southern R. Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Jacobs v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Wabash Railroad v. McNownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- State ex rel. Romona Oölitic Stone Co. v. Central States Bridge Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. McFarrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.