Hill ex rel. Ray v. Director-General of Railroads
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Motioet to remove action to the Federal Court, heard before Adams, J at September Term, 1919, of RowaN. ■ There was judgment in denial of the motion, and the defendant, the Director-General of Railroads, excepted and appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.
Plaintiff, a citizen and resident of North Carolina, institutes this actions against the North Carolina Railroad Company, a domestic corporation, and the Director-General of Railroads, as having charge of same under the Eederal statutes and executive proclamations and orders applicable, to recover damages for physical injuries wrongfully suffered by plaintiff of the defendant from the negligent operation *609of defendant’s road in Rowan County, N. 0., by its lessee, tbe Southern Railway Company, a Virginia corporation. Having filed his complaint, setting forth facts of the occurrence, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- American Car & Foundry Co. v. KettlehakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Southern Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Fritzlen v. Boatmen's BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Lathrop, Shea & Henwood Co. v. Interior Construction & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Shipp Ex Rel. Shipp v. United Stage Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Logan v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. UmbaughNevada Supreme Court · 1942
- Clements v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Parker v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.