Logan v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
It is settled law in this State that railway companies are private, as distinguished from public, corporations. Hughes v.Commissioners, 107 N.C. 598; Durham v. R. R., 108 N.C. 399. But when the power of eminent domain is delegated for the purpose of enabling other companies to discharge duties for the public benefit, they occupy a different relation to the State and the people from that of ordinary private corporations, the powers of (945) which are given and exercised exclusively for the profit or advantage of their stockholders, and are therefore called quasi-public, though they fall within…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Cowan v. . FairbrotherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. PeytonIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Patton v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Braslin v. Somerville Horse RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Balsley v. St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Benton v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Perry v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Clements v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- McCabe's Admx. v. Maysville & B. S. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Van Valkenburgh v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.