Legal Opinion

Cartwright v. Coppersmith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1943PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

Tbe appellant, Mrs. Whitehurst, assigns error in tbe ruling of tbe court below in tbe exclusion of portions of tbe testimony of defendant W. B. Coppersmith, Sr. By tbis witness it was sought to prove certain personal transactions and communications between him and tbe deceased Sarah E. Elliott. Upon objection tbis testimony was excluded by tbe court on tbe ground that it was rendered incompetent by C. S., 1795.

While tbis statute provides specifically that “a party or person interested in tbe event” shall not be examined as a witness in bis own behalf or interest, against tbe executor of a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bunn v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Newman v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Allen v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Wilson v. . FeatherstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Fidelity Bank v. Wysong & Miles Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Galemore v. Mid-West National Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Sinclair v. TravisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Price v. WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Holloway v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Collins v. CovertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API