Legal Opinion

Rothwell v. J. B. Brice & R. Higgins

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1923PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, Judge:

Demurrer to the bill was overruled and the action of the court in so doing is certified for review. Can plaintiff assert his claim in a court of equity? This is the sole question presented.

Rothwell, the plaintiff, contends that Higgins Construction Company owes him a debt of at least $2940; and that the county court, also a defendant, owes him the sum of $3,468;' and the object of his bill is to collect these amounts from the respective debtors. It appears from the bill that his two claims above set out arise in this way: J. B. Brice and R. Higgins, as a partnership, afterwards…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Wellsburg v. KimberlandsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Fowle v. Lawrason'sSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. Stuart's heirs v. CoalterCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1826
  4. Laidley v. LaidleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Lafever v. BillmyerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1871

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fredeking v. GrimmettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. West Virginia Tractor & Equipment Co. v. Orlando Coals, Inc. (In Re Orlando Coals, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1980
  3. Natural Gas Co. v. SommervilleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Fredeking v. GrimmettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Fredeking v. GrimmettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API