Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fredeking v. Grimmett

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1955No. 10666Published

1DissentGiven, Judge

It is my position that there is no ambiguity in the simple written rental contract involved and, that though the word “sold” be assumed to be ambiguous, the evidence relating to any ambiguity supports the finding and holding of the trial court as to what was intended by the parties. The rental provided in the contract for the property leased was “twenty dollars ($20.00) per month payable in advance, and the said party of the second part further agrees to pay one cent (1^) per gallon on all gasoline sold at the aforesaid filling station”. In the course of the operation of the filling station…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Rothwell v. J. B. Brice & R. HigginsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Kertesz v. FalgianoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API