Berg v. TORRINGTON LIVESTOCK CATTLE CO.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
[¶ 1] Daren S. Berg and Jennifer A. Berg (the Bergs) filed this pro se appeal from summary judgment entered against them in an action to collect on a promissory note. Due to deficiencies in the filed appeal, we summarily affirm.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] Ten arguments are listed by the Bergs:
1. The district court erred in denying Bergs their preserved right to a jury trial.
2, The district court erred in holding that there was no breech [sic] of contract against Torrington Livestock Cattle Company.
3. The district court erred in holding secured collateral on a promissary [sic] note did not have…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hamburg v. HeilbrunWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Forbis v. ForbisWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- McElreath v. STATE EX REL. WORKERS'COMP.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Finch v. PomeroyWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
3Cited by11 opinions
- Russell Fay Harrison v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Todd McInerney v. Veronica KramerWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
- Call v. Town of ThayneWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Cor v. Sinclair Services Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- In the Interest Of: Bass, Minor Child. Teresa Dell Blaurock v.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.