Legal Opinion

Berg v. TORRINGTON LIVESTOCK CATTLE CO.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2012No. S-11-0229PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶ 1] Daren S. Berg and Jennifer A. Berg (the Bergs) filed this pro se appeal from summary judgment entered against them in an action to collect on a promissory note. Due to deficiencies in the filed appeal, we summarily affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Ten arguments are listed by the Bergs:

1. The district court erred in denying Bergs their preserved right to a jury trial.

2, The district court erred in holding that there was no breech [sic] of contract against Torrington Livestock Cattle Company.

3. The district court erred in holding secured collateral on a promissary [sic] note did not have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hamburg v. HeilbrunWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Forbis v. ForbisWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. McElreath v. STATE EX REL. WORKERS'COMP.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Finch v. PomeroyWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Russell Fay Harrison v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Todd McInerney v. Veronica KramerWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Call v. Town of ThayneWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Cor v. Sinclair Services Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  5. In the Interest Of: Bass, Minor Child. Teresa Dell Blaurock v.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API