Legal Opinion

Finch v. Pomeroy

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 2006No. 05-183PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Carlos Finch, pro se, appeals from the district court’s order granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss his complaint. In his complaint, Mr. Finch stated his causes of action as follows:

COMPLAINT FOR INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND/OR NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, TRESPASS TO CHATTEL, AND/OR CONVERSION, CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE, 42 USC 1983, INTERFERING WITH FEDERAL PROTECTED ACTIVITY-RIGHT TO PRESENT EVIDENCE-RIGHT TO PETITION THE COURTS — DUE PROCESS CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1870, CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871.

[¶ 2] In response, the appellees raise a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nathan v. American Global UniversityWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Rammell v. Mountainaire Animal Clinic, P.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Todd McInerney v. Veronica KramerWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Berg v. TORRINGTON LIVESTOCK CATTLE CO.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Call v. Town of ThayneWyoming Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API