Finch v. Pomeroy
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, Justice.
[¶ 1] Carlos Finch, pro se, appeals from the district court’s order granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss his complaint. In his complaint, Mr. Finch stated his causes of action as follows:
COMPLAINT FOR INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND/OR NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, TRESPASS TO CHATTEL, AND/OR CONVERSION, CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE, 42 USC 1983, INTERFERING WITH FEDERAL PROTECTED ACTIVITY-RIGHT TO PRESENT EVIDENCE-RIGHT TO PETITION THE COURTS — DUE PROCESS CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1870, CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1871.
[¶ 2] In response, the appellees raise a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nathan v. American Global UniversityWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Rammell v. Mountainaire Animal Clinic, P.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Todd McInerney v. Veronica KramerWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
- Berg v. TORRINGTON LIVESTOCK CATTLE CO.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Call v. Town of ThayneWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.