Legal Opinion

Cowden v. Williams

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1927No. Civil No. 2535PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an action against certain stockholders of the former Central Bank of Phoenix, hereinafter called the hank, based on section 11, article 14, of the Constitution of Arizona, and section 23 of chapter 31, Session Laws of 1922, commonly known as the state Banking Code, to recover the double liability referred to in those sections. Originally there were some eighteen separate suits filed, one against each stockholder, but by consent of counsel they were consolidated in the lower court, and are heard here as one appeal.

All but one of the facts necessary for a determination of this appeal…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Golden v. CervenkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Barth v. PockMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Henley v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Alsop v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Noble v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. City of Phoenix v. DrinkwaterArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Pioneer Annuity Life Insurance v. RichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. Dagg v. HammonsArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Moran v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API