Legal Opinion

People v. Regan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 4, 1994No. 94SA15PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Andrew J. Regan, the respondent in this attorney disciplinary proceeding, 1 did not answer the formal complaint filed by the assistant disciplinary counsel and did not appear before a hearing board, although he has appeared in this court. The hearing board determined that Regan had violated the Code of Professional Responsibility and recommended that he be suspended for one year and that he pay restitution, interest, and costs. A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the board’s findings and recommendation. Neither the assistant disciplinary counsel nor the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. BarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. People v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. People v. RauboltSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. People v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. People v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. RossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. People v. BottinelliSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. People v. FieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. People v. RandolphSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  5. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Douglas Leo ROMERO, 35464Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API