Legal Opinion

Morris Shelkofsky v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 20, 2013No. 11-765CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; Military Retirement Pay; Disability Retirement Pay; Severance Pay; Supplementation of Record

OPINION AND ORDER

HODGES, Judge.

Administrative confusion has plagued Mi’. Shelkofsky in his dealings with various mili tary retirement agencies. He brings this claim for reserve retirement pay and reserve retirement back pay in hopes that this court will sort it out. Once the disordered factual history of his problem becomes clear, however, the unfortunate result is that we have no basis for assisting this plaintiff. The errors of the past, some of which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Metz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Walls v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. Evelyn L. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Barnick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shelkofsky v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. Deemer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API