(PC) Lipsey v. Seitz
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR., Case No. 1:18-cv-00766-AWI-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS S. KERNAN AS A 13 v. DEFENDANT 14 B. SEITZ, et al., (Doc. 26) 15 Defendants. 14-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 On December 13, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (Doc. 18 21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915A and found that it states a cognizable retaliation claim 19 against B. Seitz, but fails to state cognizable claims against the remaining defendants. (Doc. 23.) 20 Accordingly,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.