Legal Opinion

Gearing v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 24, 1975No. 1 CA-CIV 2727PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONOFRIO, Judge.

The appellant insurance company asserts that it was denied due process of law in violation of the United States Constitution due to the fact that it was not notified by the Maricopa County Attorney’s office of the forfeiture of a bond it had posted for appellant Gearing when Gearing failed to appear for his trial in a criminal action charging him with embezzlement.

The insurance company had posted a $3,500 bond to effect the release of Gearing on the criminal charge. Trial was set for January 24, 1972. Gearing did not appear at trial, therefore his bond was ordered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Evans v. KloeppelSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
  2. Isgrig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  3. State v. Superior Court in & for County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Bayham v. Maryland National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. State of Arizona v. Sun Surety Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. State v. Arizona BailmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API