Gearing v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DONOFRIO, Judge.
The appellant insurance company asserts that it was denied due process of law in violation of the United States Constitution due to the fact that it was not notified by the Maricopa County Attorney’s office of the forfeiture of a bond it had posted for appellant Gearing when Gearing failed to appear for his trial in a criminal action charging him with embezzlement.
The insurance company had posted a $3,500 bond to effect the release of Gearing on the criminal charge. Trial was set for January 24, 1972. Gearing did not appear at trial, therefore his bond was ordered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Evans v. KloeppelSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
- Isgrig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- State v. Superior Court in & for County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Bayham v. Maryland National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- State of Arizona v. Sun Surety Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State v. Arizona BailmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018