Legal Opinion
Scheer v. City of Syracuse
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1964PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichard D. Simons, J.
Defendant moves to vacate a notice of examination before trial served on the defendant by the plaintiff seeking the oral deposition of D. A. Van Ornam, an employee of the Police Department of the City of Syracuse.
Van Ornam is a policeman who was assigned to investigate an accident involving the plaintiff and a vehicle owned by defendant. He arrived at the scene subsequent to the accident, investigated and made out a police report. Plaintiff urges that he is subject to examination as an employee of a party to the action (CPLR 3101, subd. [a], par. [1]).
Municipal corporations, by their…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Buffalo v. Hanna Furnace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- De Vito v. New York Central RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Zdonczik v. Pennsylvania & Southern Gas Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- White v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Hammel Station Estates, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Weisgold v. Kiamesha Concord, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
- Scott v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Walker v. Erie-Lackawanna RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Davis v. Eastman Kodak Co.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- Free Synagogue of Flushing v. Board of EstimateNew York Supreme Court · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.