Legal Opinion

Weisgold v. Kiamesha Concord, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1966PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence H. Cooke, J.

In this negligence action in which plaintiffs seek damages for personal injuries, defendant moves: (1) to vacate a notice served upon it calling for the production of and the right to inspect a report made by defendant’s employee; and (2) for an order directing one of the plaintiffs *457to submit to a physical examination by a physician in the county where the action is to be tried.

Plaintiffs contend that, insofar as their notice was for discovery and production of a document pursuant to CPLB 3120 and defendant not having moved for a protective order within the five-day period specified in CPLR…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. De Vito v. New York Central RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Walker v. Erie-Lackawanna RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Zdonczik v. Pennsylvania & Southern Gas Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Montgomery Ward Co. v. City of LockportNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Scheer v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hoenig v. WestphalNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Brandman v. Cross & Brown Co. of Florida, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Winston v. ManganNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Mosca v. PenskyNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Dikun v. New York Central RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API