Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Russ
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 16, 1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
113 N.J. Super. 445 (1971)
274 A.2d 75
JOAN HOLMES, PLAINTIFF,
v.
EVERETT L. RUSS, SR., AND ROBERT L. HOLMES, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided February 16, 1971.
Mr. Arnold N. Fishman appeared for plaintiff. (Messrs. Weinberg and Fishman, attorneys.)
Mr. Arthur Montano appeared for defendant, Holmes. (Messrs. Kisselman, Devine, Deighan & Montano, attorneys.)
Mr. J. Robert McGroarty appeared for defendant, Russ. (Messrs. Orlando and Orlando, attorneys).
HEINE, J.S.C.
This case involves the availability of the statute of limitations as a defense to an interspousal suit for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Immer v. RiskoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Ajamian v. SchlangerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- STATE BY PARSONS v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Garrou v. Teaneck Tryon Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tevis v. TevisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- D.J.L. v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Motley v. MotleyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Ravelo v. CampbellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- Tevis v. TevisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979