Legal Opinion

Tevis v. Tevis

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 5, 1979Published

1Opinion of the Court

79 N.J. 422 (1979)

400 A.2d 1189

JANINA TEVIS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT,

v.

MICHAEL TEVIS, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 13, 1978.

Decided April 5, 1979.

Mr. Ira D. Dorian argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Matthew Grayson, attorney).

Mr. Alan Wasserman argued the cause for cross-appellant (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman and Spitzer, attorneys; Mr. Frederick J. Dennehy, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HANDLER, J.

Plaintiff Janina Tevis instituted a suit for damages for injuries received as a result of a…

Also in this document: Dissent · Pashman; Dissent · Hughes; Concurrence.

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  4. Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  5. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API