Morgan v. Ameritech
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge.
Congress giveth,
Congress taketh away.
Jury trial under § 510 of ERISA?
No. It is for nought.
I. FACTS ALLEGED IN THE COMPLAINT
Ameritech Corporation adopted an employee benefit plan called Ameritech Sick ness and Disability Benefit Plan (“Plan”). Pursuant to section 4.8 of the Plan, all accident disability benefits paid by the Plan were charged to Ameritech’s operating expenses. The Plan provided coverage for employees of Ameritech who had six (6) or more net credited months of service. Moreover, the Plan was subject to regulation under the Employee Retirement…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Viking Resources, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- In re Unity Software Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024