Legal Opinion

Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. Bryan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1914No. 5407, 5408PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Nashville—Judge Cranford presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.

1: “Where a judge in passing on a motion for a new trial did not originally try the case, his discretion is not as broad as it would be otherwise; but he still has discretion to grant a new trial, where the evidence preponderates against the verdict” . (Brice v. Whitehurst, 8 Ga. App. 291, 68 S. E. 1075), or where, under the evidence and the law applicable to the issue made, the verdict rendered was not demanded, and it is not made plainly to appear that the judge abused his discretion, Butler v. Sansone, 138 Ga. 767 (76 S. E. 54); Civil Code, § 6204-*2542. The provisions of sections 6088 and 6204…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brice & Co. v. Whitehurst & HilliardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  2. Butler v. SansoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Throgmorton v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Covin v. Cairo Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  5. Schofield v. LangleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API