Covin v. Cairo Banking Co.

1. Under the evidence in this case, this court is unable to say that the court below abused its discretion in the first grant of a new trial, even though it appears that a different judge than the one who tried the case was then acting. See in this connection Van Giesen v. Queen Insurance Co., 132 Ga. 515 (64 S. E. 456); Ga. So. & Fla. Ry. Co. v. Bryan, 15 Ga. App. 253 (82 S. E. 913). The judgment complained of in the main bill of exceptions is therefore affirmed.

2. The cross-bill of exceptions assigns error upon exceptions pendente lite taken to the order of the trial court refusing to…