Brice & Co. v. Whitehurst & Hilliard
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Trover; from city court of Nashville — Judge E. Eve presiding. December 3, 1909.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
1. Where a judge passing on a motion for a new trial did not original^ try the ease, his discretion is not as broad' as it would be otherwise; but he still has discretion to grant a new trial, where the evidence preponderates against the verdict.
2. Where a vendor sells personal property, reserving title to secure the purchase-price, and the vendee, with the vendor’s consent, sells the property to a third person, who assumes the payment of the balance of the purchase-price to the original vendor, the. latter can not recover in trover the property from the third person without offering to put…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Jones v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Standard Motors Finance Co. v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Hilliard & Hilliard v. Brice & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Schofield v. LangleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.