Legal Opinion

Brice & Co. v. Whitehurst & Hilliard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 28, 1910No. 2381PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Trover; from city court of Nashville — Judge E. Eve presiding. December 3, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. Where a judge passing on a motion for a new trial did not original^ try the ease, his discretion is not as broad' as it would be otherwise; but he still has discretion to grant a new trial, where the evidence preponderates against the verdict.

2. Where a vendor sells personal property, reserving title to secure the purchase-price, and the vendee, with the vendor’s consent, sells the property to a third person, who assumes the payment of the balance of the purchase-price to the original vendor, the. latter can not recover in trover the property from the third person without offering to put…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. Standard Motors Finance Co. v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  3. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  4. Hilliard & Hilliard v. Brice & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  5. Schofield v. LangleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API