Legal Opinion
Patrick Hammer Fay, Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 2, 2015No. A14-1487PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLEARY, Chief Judge.
Relator Patrick Fay was eligible for unemployment benefits but missed a reemployment assistance services meeting. Respondent Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) determined that relator was ineligible for unemployment benefits for the week that he missed the meeting because he failed, without good cause, to attend. Relator filed an online appeal and an unemployment law judge (ULJ) conducted an evidentiary hearing. The ULJ found that relator did not have good cause for missing the meeting and was ineligible for unemployment benefits for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. LeathersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. MauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Stassen v. Lone Mountain Truck Leasing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anthony Browne, Relator v. M. A. Mortenson Company, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Ayode A. Ogunkola, Relator v. Cirrus Design Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Paul Hecimovich, Relator v. Always There Staffing, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Rosevelt Beal, Relator v. Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016