Legal Opinion
United States v. Frank J. Gammache, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 29, 1983No. 82-1690PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
The Government commenced this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1345 for a declaratory judgment, to quiet title to the land in dispute, and for ejectment. Defendant-appellant Frank Gammache, Jr., counterclaimed for similar relief. Defendant Gammache brings this timely appeal from…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Michael Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corporation, D/B/A Target Stores, a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Deepwater Investments, Limited v. Jackson Hole Ski Corporation and Paul M. McCollisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Thatcher Enterprises v. Cache County CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Dick Dickeson and Beth Weaver v. Deloyd Quarberg and the Board of County Commissioners of Hot Springs County, WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Flanagan v. MungerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Weir v. Anaconda Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.