Legal Opinion
In re Conte
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 5, 2002No. 02-1150PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Francis L. Conte appeals from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences affirming the rejection of claims 1 and 4-10 of U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/331,851 as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Ex parte Conte, Appeal No.2000-2033, slip op. at 9 (Bd. Pat.App. & Inter. Sept. 20, 2001) (Paper No. 27) (“Conte II”). Because the Board’s decision was supported by substantial evidence and is correct as a matter of law, we affirm.
DISCUSSION
Mr. Conte is the named inventor of the ’851 application, which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- In Re Carl D. ClayCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- In Re Portola Packaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- In Re Jack G. MakariCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Teleflex Inc. v. KSR International Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Tokyo Keiso Co., Ltd. v. SMC Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Broussard v. Go-Devil Manufacturing Co. of LA., Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2014
- In Re: AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Nano-Second Technology Co. v. Dynaflex InternationalDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013