Legal Opinion
Nano-Second Technology Co. v. Dynaflex International
District Court, C.D. California
Decided May 10, 2013No. CV 10-9176 RSWL (MANx)Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER Re: Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of ' Invalidity [230]
RONALD S.W. LEW, Senior District Judge.
Currently before the Court is Defendants Dynaflex International and GForce Corporation’s (“Defendants”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Invalidity [230]. The Court having reviewed all papers submitted pertaining to this Motion and having considered all arguments presented to the Court, NOW FINDS AND RULES AS FOLLOWS:
The Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
*858I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Nano-Second Technology Co. (“Plaintiff’) brought this Action…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.