Legal Opinion

George Albert Williams v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 20, 1969No. 20927PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*640McGOWAN, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal, by leave of this court, from an affirmance by the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 227 A.2d 60 (1967), of a conviction in the Court of General Sessions for the use in a public street of “profane language, indecent and obscene words” in violation of 22 D.C.Code § 1107 (1967) — a disorderly conduct statute which has remained virtually unchanged since 1898. A division of this court first heard the matter and, with one judge dissenting, affirmed, although only after attributing to the trial court a construction of the statute more restrictive than…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Washington Mobilization Committee v. Maurice J. Cullinane, Chief of the Metropolitan Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Roy L. Thomas, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. United Federation of Postal Clerks v. BlountDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1971
  4. Thomas Wayne Joyce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. Illinois Citizens Committee for Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API