Legal Opinion
State v. Foster
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided October 30, 1995No. 21415PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
In this case we are called upon to determine the validity of a vehicular search. After the district court denied his motion to suppress evidence seized from his vehicle, Brenton Craig Foster entered a conditional plea of guilty to felony possession of a controlled substance, I.C. § 37-2732(c), and misdemeanor battery on a law enforcement officer, I.C. §§ 18-903(a), 18-915. Foster now appeals, contending that the warrantless search of his automobile violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Art. I § 17 of the Idaho Constitution. Because we find that the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. WanzekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. McCarthyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. RobbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.