Legal Opinion

State v. Robb

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 20, 2000No. C1-98-1872PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Justice.

In this case we review the pretrial order of the district court suppressing, on Fourth Amendment grounds, a shotgun and ammunition seized during a search of respondent Jeffrey Lyle Robb’s vehicle. We conclude, as did the court of appeals, that the state has failed to demonstrate, clearly and unequivocally, that the order was in error and we affirm.

A shotgun and ammunition were seized during a search of Robb’s vehicle in Anoka County. At 9 o’clock on a July evening in 1998, two Anoka County deputies on routine patrol at the Linwood Lake landing noticed a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. CaseresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. State v. GausterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. State v. OrtegaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. State v. McLeodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API